A New Technique To Differentiate Parkinson’s And Multiple Systems Atrophy
Parkinson’s disease and multiple system atrophy are conditions that coincide in many respects. Its symptoms are similar and research on its origin points in a similar direction.
Both are neurodegenerative diseases that inexorably progress to more serious forms. Finding effective treatment also involves looking for ways to diagnose disorders early enough to address them.
The journal Nature has published in February of this year some advances in this regard. Perhaps the most relevant is the one commanded by the University of Texas, where a technique is proposed that could differentiate between Parkinson’s and multiple systems atrophy.
Considering the difficulty that doctors have to diagnose one or the other in the beginning, the advance could be relevant. An accurate and timely diagnosis would allow the establishment of appropriate treatments without delaying the approach. Let us bear in mind that, so far, the only way to know if it is one disorder or another is to wait for the evolution.
Clinically, multiple system atrophy progresses faster than Parkinson’s, therefore, a delay is a worse prognosis. And, certainly, when the symptoms are too evident it is because the evolution was accelerated. Biologically, the delay translates into larger neurons with irreversible damage.
What is Parkinson’s disease?
Parkinson’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disease. The biggest sign of it is movement disturbance. Parkinson’s patients present with evident tremors and shaking, mostly in the hands and legs.
Over time, the disorder extends the difficulty of movements to other parts of the body, adding rigidity. This leads to imbalances, lack of coordination and slower implementation of actions.
The chemical alteration known as the immediate cause is a lack of dopamine. Dopamine is a substance that works as a neurotransmitter in the nervous system. Its lack paves the way for the symptoms of the disease.
It is more common in those over 60, and therefore age is considered a risk factor. However, some juvenile clinical presentations are possible. The most symbolic case in the world is that of actor Michael J. Fox, who was diagnosed at age 29.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkPrivacy policy